The Service Members Civil Relief Act of 2003 (SCRA) formerly known as the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940 (SSCRA) is a federal law that gives all military members some important rights as they enter active duty and while on active duty.  It covers such issues as rental agreements, security deposits, prepaid rent, eviction, installment contracts, credit card interest rates, mortgage interest rates, mortgage foreclosure, civil judicial proceedings, and income tax payments.

The SCRA also protects active duty military members and reservists or members of the National Guard called to active duty (starting on the date active duty orders are received) and, in limited situations, dependents of military members (e.g., certain eviction actions).

To receive protection under some parts of the SCRA, the member must be prepared to show that military service has had a “material effect” on the legal or financial matter involved.  Protection under the SCRA must be requested during the member’s military duty or within 30 to 180 days after military service ends, depending on the protection being requested.

In many situations, the SCRA protections are not automatic, but require some action to invoke the Act. For example, to obtain a reduction of your pre-active duty mortgage or credit card interest rates, you should send your lender/creditor a written request and a copy of your mobilization orders.

The Six Percent Loan Cap

One of the more well-known protections of the SCRA is the 6% loan provision.  In general, service members may be entitled to have the interest rate on some loans reduced to 6% for the time the member is on active duty. This provision is especially useful for Reservists and National Guard members.  Of course, there are a number of special requirements that must be met in order to qualify for the interest rate reduction.  Some of the eligibility requirements are:

  • The service member obtained the loan during a time when he or she was not on any form of active duty in any branch of the military.
  • The interest rate is currently above 6% per year.
  • The service member’s  military service affects the ability to pay the loan at the regular (pre-service) interest rate. Generally this requirement means that the member makes less money in the military than as a civilian.
  • The service member must notify the lender in writing, explain the situation, and provide a copy of the orders placing the member on active duty.

Delay of Court and Administrative Proceedings

A major benefit provided by the SCRA is that it permits active duty service members, who are unable to appear in a court or administrative proceeding due to their military duties, to postpone the proceeding for a mandatory minimum of ninety days upon the service member’s request.  The request must be in writing and (1) explain why the current military duty materially effects the service member’s ability to appear, (2) provide a date when the service member can appear, and (3) include a letter from the commander stating that the service member’s duties preclude his or her appearance and that he is not authorized leave at the time of the hearing. This letter or request to the court will not constitute a legal appearance in court. Further delays may be granted at the discretion of the court, and if the court denies additional delays, an attorney must be appointed to represent the service member. (See Section 202, SCRA)

Default Judgment Protection

If a person does not appear in court when ordered to do so, the judge may render a verdict against that person.  This is called a default judgment.  Obviously, if a service member is overseas, deployed, on classified duty or in transit then the service member will not be able to appear at a court hearing and may suffer a default judgment.  If a default judgment is entered against a service member during his or her active duty service, or within 60 days thereafter, the SCRA allows the service member to reopen that default judgment and set it aside.  In order to set aside a default judgment, the service member must show that he or she was prejudiced by not being able to appear in person, and that he or she has good and legal defenses to the claims against him or her. The service member must apply to the court for relief within 90 days of the termination or release from military service.  This provision is especially useful to Reservists and Guardsmen who may in the middle of a legal proceeding when they are ordered onto active duty. If the court ignores the Delay of Court provisions (discussed above) and renders a default judgment, the Reservist or Guardsman can have the default judgment set aside upon their return to their home.  (See Section 201, SCRA)

Stay of Foreclosure

In today’s recession and drop in housing prices, many service members have seen civilian pay cuts or job loss and found themselves unable to make their mortgage payments.  If a service member faces foreclosure and while ordered onto active duty, it can make a stressful situation even more so.  The SCRA provides relief to such service members.  A foreclosure action against a Reservist or Guardsman must be halted when that service member is called up onto active duty.  The bank can only proceed if it obtains a court order.  This provision protects mortgages entered into while the service member was in civilian status.  (See Section 303, SCRA).

Termination of Leases

In the past, upon having to leave their home on active duty orders, many Reservists and Guardsmen were caught by surprise when the landlords or car companies with whom they had leases filed lawsuits for termination of the leases or demanded large cash payments to settle the lease.  New provisions to the SCRA protect members in these situations. 

The SCRA allows termination of leases by active duty service members who subsequently receive orders for a permanent change of station (PCS) or a deployment for a period of 90 days or more. The SCRA also includes automobiles leased for personal or business use by service members and their dependents. The pre-service automobile lease may be cancelled if the service member receives active duty orders for a period of one hundred and eighty (180) days or more. The automobile lease entered into while the service member is on active duty may be terminated if the service member receives PCS orders to a (1) location outside the continental United States or (2) deployment orders for a period of one hundred and eighty days or more. (See Section 305, SCRA).

Eviction for Nonpayment of Rent

Military members and their dependents (in their own right) have some protection from eviction if military service impacts their ability to pay rent.  In order to evict a military member or his or her dependents, the landlord must obtain a court order.  The court must find the member’s failure to pay is not materially affected by military service. Material effect is present where the service member does not earn sufficient income to pay the rent.  Where the member is materially affected by military service, the member may request the court stay the eviction for three months.  The court may decide on a shorter or longer period in the interest of justice. There is no requirement that the lease be entered into before entry on active duty, and the court could make any other “just” order under § 301 of the SCRA. The requirements of this section are:

  • The landlord is attempting eviction during a period in which the service member is in military service or after receipt of orders to report to duty
  • The rented premises is used for housing by the spouse, children, or other dependents of the service member
  • The agreed rent does not exceed $2,465 per month.  (See Section 305, SCRA)

 Carlos L. McDade, Esq.

federalOn November 13, 2009, the Department of Justice and Department of Defense issued joint decisions as to the forum, or the type of criminal trial that would hear the prosecution of ten detainees at Guantanamo Bay.  Those ten detainees include five detainees accused of conspiring to commit the September 11, 2001 terror attacks and a detainee accused of orchestrating the attack on the USS Cole.  The press release announced that five would be tried in federal court and five would be tried before military commissions.

 “Today we announce a step forward in bringing those we believe were responsible for the 9/11 attacks and the attack on the USS Cole to justice,” said Attorney General Eric Holder.  “For over two hundred years, our nation has relied on a faithful adherence to the rule of law to bring criminals to justice and provide accountability to victims.  Once again we will ask our legal system to rise to that challenge, and I am confident it will answer the call with fairness and justice.”  Defense Secretary Robert Gates said “bringing terrorists to justice is an integral part of our national security.  The reform of Military Commissions and today’s announcement are important steps in that direction.”

The Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, has determined that the United States government will pursue a prosecution in federal court against five detainees who are currently charged in military commissions with conspiring to commit the September 11, 2001 terror attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 individuals.  These detainees are Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin ‘Attash, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi.

These detainees will be transferred to the United States for trial after all legal requirements, including a 45-day notice and report to Congress, are satisfied, and consultations with state and local authorities have been completed.  The detainees will be housed in a federal detention facility in New York, which includes maximum security units that have securely held terrorism suspects in the past.   Once federal charges are brought against these detainees, military commission charges now pending against them will be withdrawn. 

The Attorney General has also determined, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, that the prosecutions of five other Guantanamo Bay detainees who were charged in military commissions may be resumed in that forum.  These detainees include the detainee accused of orchestrating the October 2000 attack on the USS Cole, which killed 17 U.S. sailors and injured dozens of others, and a detainee who is accused of participating in an Al-Qaeda plot to blow up oil tankers in the Straits of Hormuz.

The Attorney General and the Secretary of Defense are confident that detainees now held at Guantanamo Bay can be detained securely in U.S. detention facilities and that their trials can be conducted effectively and safely in the United States, whether in federal court or in a military commission.

Over the past decade, the Department of Justice has successfully prosecuted many terrorism defendants in our federal courts.  Today, there are more than 200 inmates who have a history of or nexus to international terrorism, who have been convicted in federal courts, and are now housed securely in Bureau of Prisons facilities.  The Department has already transferred one former Guantanamo Bay detainee, Ahmed Ghailani, to the Southern District of New York to face trial for his alleged role in the 1998 East Africa Embassy bombings.

With regard to military commissions, the reforms Congress recently adopted to the Military Commissions Act will ensure that commission trials are fair, effective, and lawful.  Military commissions have been used by the United States to try those who have violated the law of war for more than two centuries.   Further, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld Congress’ power to determine the need for military commissions and to provide their jurisdiction and procedures, and this Congress has recently reiterated its support for commissions in adopting important reforms to the Military Commissions Act. 

Carlos L. McDade, Esq.

Colonel (Retired), USAF

Click here to read the Attorney General’s Remarks:

http://www.justice.gov/ag/speeches/2009/ag-speech-091113.html

States Provide Benefits to Veterans

veteranMassachusetts, West Virginia, Pennsylvania and South Dakota have special programs that provide benefits directly to Veterans. These benefits are in addition to benefits offered by the federal Veterans Administration.  Some of these programs are specifically for Veterans of the Persian Gulf I and II, Afghanistan, and Iraq conflicts and some states have bonus programs going back to WWI and to the present.  

Veterans or the families of deceased Veterans of all wars/conflicts or eras should check with their state Veterans affairs office to see if they are eligible for any bonuses offered by a state. Note: Veterans should pay particular attention to eligibility rules for any bonus. A listing of State Veterans affairs office is located at on the United States Department of Veterans Affairs website at http://www.va.gov/statedva.htm.

Carlos L. McDade, Esq., Colonel (Retired), USAF

Iraq Supply Thefts Net Former Officer Up to 97 Months in Prison

Robert Young, 57, a former captain in the U.S. Army, was sentenced today to 97 months in prison for his participation in a scheme to steal approximately 10 million gallons of fuel from the U.S. Army in Iraq.   U.S. District Court Judge Claude M. Hilton sentenced Young to three years of supervised release to follow his prison term, and ordered him to pay $26,276,427 in restitution. Young was also ordered to forfeit $1 million in personal profits he made from the scheme.  The sentence was handed down on November 6, 2009.

Young pleaded guilty on July 24, 2009, to both counts of a two-count superseding indictment charging him and Robert Jeffery with conspiracy and theft of government property.

Young admitted that in October 2007, while serving as a contractor in Iraq, he and other co-conspirators agreed to participate in a scheme to steal fuel from the U.S. Army.   Between October 2007 and May 2008, he and his co-conspirators told people they were Department of Defense contractors in Iraq.  They used fraudulently obtained documents to enter the Victory Bulk Fuel Point (VBFP) in Camp Liberty, Iraq, and presented false fuel authorization forms to steal aviation and diesel fuel from the VBFP for subsequent sale on the black market.   The United States owns and operates the VBFP in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.   The VBFP supplies fuel to both military units and U.S. Government contractors operating in and around the Victory Base Complex.   Young admitted that he and his co-conspirators employed several individuals to serve as drivers and escorts of the trucks containing the stolen fuel.   Young personally made $1 million from his crimes.

Robert Jeffery, Lee William Dubois and Michel Jamil were convicted for their participation in the same crimes.  Dubois was sentenced to three years in prison.  Jeffrey and Jamil are awaiting sentencing.  The cases were investigated by U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the FBI and members of the National Procurement Fraud Task Force and the International Contract Corruption Task Force (ICCTF) and prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office.   The ICCTF is a joint law enforcement agency task force that seeks to detect, investigate and dismantle corruption and contract fraud resulting from U.S. Overseas Contingency Operations, including in Afghanistan, Iraq and Kuwait.

Carlos L. McDade, Esq.

Tagged with:
 

Solders marchingThe Justice Department announced October 28, 2009  that it reached a settlement to resolve its suit filed on behalf of former Utah Army National Guardsman and current Air Force Reservist Matthew T. Denning against Stonescape Pavers, LLC.  The settlement must be approved by the federal court in Las Vegas.  The Department’s complaint, filed in June 2009, alleges that Stonescape violated the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA) by terminating Denning during his statutorily protected reemployment period.  Under the terms of the settlement, embodied in an agreement that has been submitted to the court, Stonescape must provide Denning with $10,000 to compensate him for his lost wages and benefits as a result of Stonescape’s actions.

Among other things, USERRA prohibits employers from terminating a servicemember except for cause for 180 days after the employee’s date of reemployment if his or her recent period of uniformed service was more than 30 days but less than 181 days.

In its complaint, the Justice Department alleged that Denning was a salesperson for Stonescape when he was called to active duty to deploy to Iraq with the Utah Army National Guard in January 2006.  After he was honorably discharged in June 2006, he was reemployed by Stonescape.  According to the lawsuit, Stonescape terminated Denning without cause in August 2006 during his statutorily protected reemployment time period.   

“We all have a duty to ensure the brave men and women who serve our country in uniform can land on their feet after they return from active duty.  This settlement demonstrates our vigilant protection of the employment rights of our servicemembers, and our commitment to vigorous enforcement of the laws that protect them,” said Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division.

Carlos L. McDade, Esq.


Notice

The information contained on this Blog is designed to enable you to learn more about the services that Black & LoBello offers to its clients. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice, nor are they intended as a source of advertising or solicitation. Your use of this blog does not create or constitute an attorney-client relationship. You should not consider these materials to be an invitation for an attorney-client relationship. Further, you should not rely on the information provided on this blog without first obtaining separate legal advice.