The phrase “Delinquent Mortgage,” once a foreign concept for many Americans, has now become part of our everyday vernacular. When nearly 4 million homeowners are currently 60 or more days behind on their mortgages, it is actually no surprise that citizens nationwide are buzzing about the housing crisis.  That crisis is worse here in Las Vegas than it is in many other areas of the country and Las Vegas citizens are certainly feeling the economic pinch.

More than 60 percent of homeowners nationwide who have seriously delinquent loans are still not involved in any form of loss mitigation with their lenders, probably due to the frustration with the processes available.  In fact, a recent performance report indicates that nearly half of the property owners approved for trial loan modifications have fallen out of the program.  By the end of July 2010, approximately 616,839 out of the total of 1,307,489 HAMP three-month trial plans have been cancelled since the program began.  This tremendous dropout rate may be due to the lengthy process of obtaining a permanent modification.  For instance, as a result of the backlog, only 36,695 HAMP restructurings were converted to permanent status during the month of July.

For those who are already involved in loan modifications or short sales, the process may soon become even more difficult and time consuming as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have become more aggressive in forcing originating lenders to buy back bad loans.  A report by Fitch Ratings illustrates that, in a worst-case scenario, the buybacks may result in a combined loss of between $17 billion and $42 billion for the nation’s four largest banks – Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Citi.  Considering these numbers, it is safe to assume that the process will become even more tedious.

Despite homeowners’ understandable frustrations with the short sale and loan modification processes, these avenues may preserve some homeowners’ rights down the road.  For example, if a lender tries to pursue a deficiency judgment following a foreclosure, the homeowner has the ability to demonstrate efforts to work with the lender to mitigate losses.  It is hopeful that the courts will not turn a blind eye to these whole-hearted attempts.  As such, underwater homeowners should become informed, seek assistance from a legitimate source, and do their best to stay patient.

Kelle L. Kuebler, Attorney*

*Licensed only in New York and Connecticut

Tagged with:
 

According to a new report from the State Foreclosure Prevention Working Group, a group of state attorney generals and bank supervisors across the country, loan modifications made in 2009 are forty to fifty percent less likely to be delinquent six months after modification than loans modified at the same time in 2008.  Additionally, the report states that loan modifications which include a principal reduction have a lower rate of re-default.  While the report recommends principal reductions due to the improved long-term success of the loan modification, principal reductions have been rare to this point.  According to the report, only one in five modifications reduces principal.  Moreover, the report shows that seventy percent of loan modifications actually increase the amount of principal owed due to the addition of penalties, fees, and late payments.  The Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) provides for principal reductions as an alternative to its waterfall modification. However, due to the fact that government sponsored entity (GSE) loans are not eligible for principal reductions and reductions are optional, it is unlikely the principal reduction alternative to HAMP will have much impact.

Joshua D. Carlson, Esq.

Negative Equity Refinance Program

Starting September 7, 2010, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) will offer a new refinance program to qualifying underwater homeowners.  To be able to participate in the program you must be current on your home loan, your credit score must be 500 or above, and the home must constitute your primary residence.  Further, all lien holders related to the property must agree to the refinance and agree to write off at least ten percent (10%) of the unpaid principal balance.  As most borrowers know, lenders are loathed to write off any of the principal regardless of the possible incentives.  The program does, however, offer more incentives beyond new FHA-insured mortgages.  The program contemplates certain incentives for any second lien holders to provide a full or partial extinguishment of the lien.  HUD says interested homeowners should contact their lenders to determine if they are eligible and whether or not their lender agrees to write down a portion of the unpaid principal.  Keep in mind that the present loan must be a non-FHA loan.

Tisha Black Chernine, Esq.

Tagged with:
 

Tiffany N. Ballenger, Esq. will present at a series of seminars from 6:30 PM to 7:30 PM August 19th at the the Prudential Americana office located at 8337 W. Sunset #150, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89113.

Topics to be covered:
Tiffany N. Ballenger, Esq. will be discussing the differences between the short sale and foreclosure process and the pros and cons of each. She will also touch on how these processes affect credit and different circumstances to consider with each process.  Ms. Ballenger will also cover Asset Protection and how an attorney assists with negotiating deficiency judgments.

Bring friends or family members that can benefit from this very important FREE seminar series. For more information, click here.

Changes Ahead to FIRPTA

Before convening on its August break, the House of Representatives passed the Real Estate Jobs and Investment Act of 2010.  The bill advances the real estate industry’s goal of increasing foreign investment in Real Estate Investment Trusts (REIT). The Bill doubles foreign investors’ allowable ownership interest in a REIT to 10%.  Anything over that percent ownership is then subject to the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA).  Congress hopes that increasing the allowable foreign ownership interest will stimulate the US commercial real estate sector with minimal fiscal impact.

Tisha Black Chernine, Esq.

Tagged with:
 

Rarely does a loan modification include a principal reduction.  The typical loan modification only deals with the first mortgage and will only reduce the monthly payment,  not the total amount due and owing.  For most Las Vegans it does not make sense to keep paying on an asset that is completely upside-down.

Therefore, many people turn to Chapter 13 bankruptcy to modify their loans AND reduce the principal balance.  Chapter 13 bankruptcy can eliminate your second mortgage completely while bringing any missed payments on your first mortgage current over a three or five year period.  In bankruptcy, removing the second lien on a property is called “lien stripping.”  You can lien strip only if the value of your house is LESS than what you owe on your first mortgage.

For example, if the value of your home is $175,000 and you have a first mortgage of $200,000 and a second mortgage of $150,000, in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy you completely eliminate the second mortgage and only pay on the first mortgage.  Thus, in Chapter 13 bankruptcy you were able to reduce the principal amount of your home by $150,000.

Chapter 13 bankruptcy has many other benefits and, in some cases, can save your home.  To learn more, please visit Black & LoBello’s Bankruptcy Website for more details.

Randy M. Creighton, Esq.

Tagged with:
 

FHA Program for Underwater Homeowners

Beginning September 7th, the Federal Housing Authority (FHA) will offer FHA-insured mortgages to qualifying borrowers who have a non-FHA mortgage.  To be eligible, the borrower must owe more on the mortgage than the home is worth, be current on the mortgage, occupy the property as a primary residence, qualify for the new loan under standard FHA underwriting requirements, and have a credit score of at least 500.  Similar to the under-performing Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP), the FHA program will have limited affect on the current housing situation because so many borrowers are behind in their payments and lenders are reluctant to write off a portion of the principal.

Lenders are hesitant to write-off mortgage principals because then they would have to pay the investors for the amount of debt forgiven and it might establish a precedent that loan contracts can be changed due to market fluctuations. HUD recommends that borrowers contact their lenders to inquire about eligibility and whether the lenders will write down a portion of the mortgage.

Joshua D. Carlson, Esq.

Las Vegans are subjected to a non-stop barrage of commercials and advertisements from people and companies promising principal reductions through loan modifications.  However, the majority of loan modifications do not include a principal reduction.

The majority of loan modifications come in three different forms:

  1. The lender reduces your interest rate to no lower than 2%;
  2. The lender increases the term of your loan to thirty (30) or sometimes forty (40) years from the date you sign the agreement; and
  3. The lender MAY forbear on a portion of the principal or, in layman’s terms, the lender will not charge interest on a portion of the loan.  However, the borrower will owe whatever the forbear amount is at the time the house sells or at the end of the term of the new loan.  In some cases a lender may blend these tools to modify your loan.

The goal of any loan modification is to reduce the amount due and owing on the home plus any costs relating to taxes, HOA, and insurance to an amount of 31% of your gross income OR to an amount that is affordable to you.

For example, a borrower’s gross income is $6,500 per month and the mortgage plus taxes, insurance, and HOA is $2,500 month at an interest rate of 6.25%.   The outstanding principal balance of the loan is $400,000.  Therefore, the lender must reduce the monthly mortgage payment plus taxes, insurance, and HOA to $2,015 ($6,500 X 31%). If taxes, insurance, and HOA equal $300 per month then the lender must change the terms of the loan so that a payment on the principal amount of $400,000 will equal $1,715.  This can be accomplished if the lender reduces the interest to 3.5% and changes the term length of the loan to thirty (30) years from today.

A successful modification is not always the outcome.  If, in the above example, the homeowner’s gross income was only $4,200, the lender would reduce the monthly mortgage payment plus taxes, insurance and HOA to $1,302 ($4,200 X 31%).  Again, the taxes, insurance and HOA equal $300 per month.  Therefore, the lender must change the terms of the loan so that a payment on the principal amount of $400,000 will equal $1,002.  These payment adjustments are not possible without either a principal reduction or forbearance on the principal of the outstanding due and owing. Lenders are very reluctant to allow either of these options.

Declaring chapter 13 bankruptcy may also be able to reduce or eliminate many other debts, including a second lien on a property which is something no loan modification can do.   Chapter 13 can stop a foreclosure and allow a borrower up to five years to catch up on the missed payments. Many homeowners are able to catch up on their missed payments if they are given the time to do so.  Modifying a loan directly with a mortgage company will normally allow a matter of months, not years, to spread out the missed payments.

Knowing all the options makes for a more informed decision.  A good attorney can, and will, freely discuss which option is a better solution for you.

Randy M. Creighton, Esq.

It might sound strange to be told to insure retirement funds but, after working hard and diligently saving all that money, it’s worth it to make sure those funds will be available when needed.  With the transition into retirement comes the heightened possibility of age-related health problems. Unforeseen events such as stroke, heart disease, and cognitive impairment can change one’s way of life.

Many people are under the impression that government programs such as Medicare or Medicaid will cover the costs of long-term care. Medicare will cover some skilled nursing for a very limited period (20-100 days only). Medicaid will only cover long-term care costs for impoverished individuals with the caveat that there are legal planning techniques that work within the complicated Medicaid rules.  Regular health insurance does not cover nursing home or other long-term care costs except forshort-term rehabilitation.

Out-of-pocket costs for needed long-term care resulting from age-related health problems such as home care, nursing home, or assisted living can quickly deplete retirement funds and leave the remaining healthy spouse impoverished.

Long-term care insurance insures your retirement funds and provides protection so that the money stays intact while, at the same time, provides money for elder care services. In his book The Total Money Makeover, Dave Ramsey says of long-term care insurance, “If you are over sixty, buy long-term care insurance to cover in-home care or nursing home care. The average nursing home stay costs $40,000 (In Nevada over $70,000!) per year, which will crack and scramble a nest egg in a heartbeat.  Dad in the nursing home can use up Mom’s $250,000 savings in just a few short years.”

Using long-term care insurance to insure your retirement makes sense. You insure your car against damage, your home against fire, and you purchase life insurance.   Why not insure what can be the largest and most devastating risk to you and your family?  Unlike other risks you insure against, long-term care is the most likely to happen. Long-term care insurance will also help you keep your independence and dignity and allow you to make choices about where you want to spend your final years.

Here are some specific reasons for buying long-term care insurance:

  • If you are married and you have a need for long-term care, your spouse will be able to pay for an outside caregiver and receive needed rest and recuperation.
  • If your children promise to take care of you, then when the time comes that you need care, insurance will help them do that by paying for aides to help with tasks such as bathing and incontinence.
  • If you are single and a need for long-term care arises and you have no family who can help you, insurance can pay for and coordinate that care.
  • If you have the desire to leave assets behind when you die, insurance will help preserve those assets from the cost of long-term care.

You should also consider buying long-term care insurance at a younger age. There is an advantage for doing this.  The premium is lower.  For example, a person, currently age 45, buying a typical policy with a spouse, could spend $21,146 in total premiums to age 78. Suppose this same person chooses to wait to buy the equivalent coverage at age 65.  If that same policy were available in the future, the couple that waits could pay $52,566 in total premiums over their 13 remaining years to age 78. Because they waited, they would pay 2 ½ times more for the same policy.  In addition to the rates going up with age, the health qualifications will be stricter and development of health problems related to aging may even disqualify a person from obtaining a policy.

There are dozens of long-term care insurance companies selling a multitude of different policy options. It can become very confusing.  For each policy, there are literally thousands of benefit combinations for home care, assisted living, nursing home care, waiting periods, payment amounts, inflation riders, and the list goes on.

LONG-TERM CARE INSURANCE BUYING CHECKLIST

Here is a checklist of some of the things you need to know before you purchase a policy.  The more “yes” answers you get the better off you are.

  1. Is the insurance company rated by A. M. Best (the rating company) with a rating of at least A, A+ or A++?
  2. Is it a large diversified company with deep pockets and selling more than just long-term care insurance?
  3. Is the insurance representative an expert in long-term care insurance? (Because of its complexity, almost all LTCi experts only sell LTCi; they seldom sell anything else.)
  4. Does the representative have a degree and/or industry financial designations?
  5. Does the representative own a personal long-term care insurance policy for himself or herself?
  6. Is the policy you like tax qualified, and if not, do you understand the ramifications?
  7. Are there at least 6 ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) allowed for in the benefit certification?
  8. Does it allow “standby assistance”?
  9. Is it a “pool of money” as opposed to a “stated period”?
  10. Is it “integrated” as opposed to “2-pool”? (2-pool is not allowed in many states.)
  11. Do you understand how the elimination period works? (This is extremely important.)
  12. Does it have prohibitive cost containment provisions?
  13. Is there any “capping” or other future reduction of automatic benefit increase riders?
  14. Do you understand how the waiver of premium works?
  15. Does the assisted living facility benefit pay the same as for nursing home?
  16. Are you buying adequate home care coverage?
  17. Does the company have a history of premium rate stability without periodic increases?
  18. Does the policy pay for homemaker services?
  19. Does the policy offer an alternative plan of care for services that don’t exist today?

Tiffany N. Ballenger, Esq.

Despite the mortgage industry’s recent decline in fraud risk, CoreLogic reports that 1 in 200 home loans still contain misrepresentations that could result in default.  Short sales have also become an area of concern due to their growing popularity as a preferred foreclosure alternative.   CoreLogic reports that short sale volume from the first quarter of 2008 through the fourth quarter of 2009 increased by more than 300 percent.  Nearly 1 in every 200 short sales were deemed “very suspicious” by lenders, meaning there was a new sale transaction less than 60 days after the short sale and the sale price was more than 20 percent higher than the short sale price.  Lenders identified income misrepresentation as the most common type of fraud, followed by internal fraud.  Also ranking high were falsifications related to borrower identity, occupancy, and the property itself.

Joshua D. Carlson, Esq.

Tagged with:
 
Page 1 of 41234

Mission Statement

The purpose of Black & LoBello is to provide exceptional legal services through customized and practical legal strategies.

Notice

The information contained on this Blog is designed to enable you to learn more about the services that Black & LoBello offers to its clients. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice, nor are they intended as a source of advertising or solicitation. Your use of this Blog does not create or constitute an attorney-client relationship. You should not consider these materials to be an invitation for an attorney-client relationship. Further, you should not rely on the information provided on this Blog without first obtaining separate legal advice.

Black & LoBello

Black & LoBello is an AV® Preeminent rated, locally owned, full service law firm in Las Vegas, Nevada.

tel. 702-869-8801

fax 702-869-2669

www.blacklobellolaw.com

10777 West Twain Avenue, 3rd Floor Las Vegas, NV 89135

For a map of our location, click here.