Many people do not understand the difference between divorce and legal separation, also known as separate maintenance.  In a divorce, the martial relationship is completely terminated. Community assets and debts are divided, child custody arrangements are formulated, and, if appropriate, spousal support is awarded.  For the purposes of a legal status, a person is then “divorced.”   In an action for separate maintenance, parties’ assets and debts are divided and custody arrangements are determined.  However the two parties are not officially divorced and, for all intents and purposes, their legal status remains “married.”

In Nevada, parties may seek a legal separation anytime they have a cause of action for divorce.  The two grounds for divorce in Nevada are 1) incompatibility and 2) living separate and apart for over one year.   In addition to these two grounds for obtaining a legal separation, spouses may also seek to become legally separated if one has been deserted by the other for a period of 90 days or longer.

People usually chose to obtain a legal separation as opposed to a divorce for one of two reasons.  First, some people’s religious beliefs prevent them from obtaining an actual divorce.  In this case, people may choose to divide their community assets and devise a custody arrangement. However, they do so with the understanding that they are still technically married according to their religion and they have agreed that neither will ever re-marry.

Second, people chose to legally separate when they are not sure they want to officially divorce but have decided to live apart for an extended period of time.  These people usually decide to officially end the “marital community,” so they will no longer be able to jointly accumulate community assets or community debts.

Amy M. Friedlander, Esq.

The Nevada Domestic Partnership Act took effect in Nevada on October 1, 2009.  Under this Act, a domestic partnership is considered a civil contract that gives domestic partners the same rights, protections, benefits, responsibilities, and obligations as parties in any other civil contract.  However, according to Section 21 Article 1 of the Nevada Constitution, only a marriage between a man and a woman can be recognized and given effect in this state.  Essentially, Nevada’s state constitution places a ban on recognizing same-sex unions as actual “marriages.”   Yet, the act itself seeks to provide rights and protections for those who register as domestic partners even if those rights and protections are not exactly the same as those afforded the standard “married” man and woman.

Many states have passed acts similar to Nevada’s Domestic Partnership Act.  Despite these state laws, the federal government operates under the Federal Defense of Marriage Act.  Under this act, “no marriage shall be recognized except for that between a man and a woman,” and applies to policies that are federally mandated or federally regulated.  Examples include Social Security benefits, survivor benefits, estate and gift taxes, and personal income tax filings which are not subject to state domestic partnership laws.  Rather, “spouses” and “marriages” are viewed as concepts defined under federal act as only being between a man and a woman.  This creates a problem for those who are registered within a state as domestic partners.  Many times, aspects of day-to-day life are controlled by federal laws that do not recognize the partnership. 

Within Nevada, one of the most significant issues facing domestic partnership laws is whether family courts have jurisdiction over domestic partnership matters.  On December 24, 2009, the Nevada Supreme Court handed down the case Landreth v. Malik (125 Nev. Adv. Op. 61).  Under the Landreth case, family court proceedings are “limited to those primarily concerning divorce, child custody or support, guardianship, and other family matters.”  Specifically, family court judges do not have jurisdiction over property disputes when property was acquired during a non-married relationship and if the couple does not have children.  As a result, because domestic partners are not considered “married,” any property division disputes that arise between domestic partners are not currently litigated in family court. 

In conclusion, while the Nevada Domestic Partnership Act seeks to confer additional rights and protections to those who enter into domestic partnerships, litigants entering into such partnerships still face challenges on both the federal level and within the state of Nevada.

 

Amy M. Friedlander, Esq.

Can You Get Divorced in Nevada?

Divorce decreeIn order to be divorced in Nevada, the state Court must first have “jurisdiction”.  In Nevada, the state court has jurisdiction if either the Plaintiff or Defendant has ”resided” in Nevada for the six weeks leading up to the filing of a Complaint for Divorce.    This six week requirement defines “residency” and is often times abused by individuals from other states with more stringent divorce laws.  It is not unusual for an individual to come to Nevada and set up a sham residence in an attempt to meet the residency requirements necessary to obtain a divorce.

If such jurisdictional conflict exists, it is crucial that you consult with an attorney immediately.  Failure to raise jurisdictional objections prior to responding to a Complaint for Divorce or appearing in Court may result in you being subject to the jurisdiction of the Court regardless of such jurisdictional defenses, depending upon the individual circumstances of your case. 

Stephanie B. MacKeen, Esq.


Mission Statement

The purpose of Black & LoBello is to provide exceptional legal services through customized and practical legal strategies.

Notice

The information contained on this Blog is designed to enable you to learn more about the services that Black & LoBello offers to its clients. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice, nor are they intended as a source of advertising or solicitation. Your use of this Blog does not create or constitute an attorney-client relationship. You should not consider these materials to be an invitation for an attorney-client relationship. Further, you should not rely on the information provided on this Blog without first obtaining separate legal advice.

Black & LoBello

Black & LoBello is an AV® Preeminent rated, locally owned, full service law firm in Las Vegas, Nevada.

tel. 702-869-8801

fax 702-869-2669

www.blacklobellolaw.com

10777 West Twain Avenue, 3rd Floor Las Vegas, NV 89135

For a map of our location, click here.